Once teh ground pounding gets disrupted by organizing bomber hunts, the bombers will need to adapt their strategy.
I disagree that its boring or easy.
I think the happy medium would be making the bomb sight mechanics authentic but retain most of the accuracy maybe increase the spread a little.
The problem with that is that shooting down bombers is just boring.
So what you're saying is that you'd prefer to have a dedicated dogfight-only match running? The Yer-2-M-105 LU is a 4.0 an can do the same in maybe 4 strikes but it is VERY slow and practically defenseless.
It could prevent players from bailing out, that is an exploit.
They lack any meaningful protection against head-ons.
Well I think it is pretty balanced due to the fact that it is not that fast and it is giant I mostly play RB with it but there are two things that can happen when you play the BV 238 either you wreck or you get completely wrecked, sure the thing can destroy alot of bases but you will just have to destroy it first, one very effective way to destroy the BV 238 is to come from below on its sides, it only has guns on the front and on the back and top, now the back facing and forward facing guns can go pretty far down but not enough if you know what you are doing you can destroy it before they get a shot off, and go for wings, engines and control surfaces shooting the fuselage does absolutely nothing and NEVER go behind it unless you some 13 and 20 mm's in your plane, and i can tell from experience that the thing does not like to be hit in the wings, I've been shot down with just a yellow wing.
Wings Of Victory =WoVi=
The game is based around combined arms battles on air, land, and sea with vehicles from the Spanish Civil War …
it usually means rage-quit.
Sure often 1 or 2 are gone but usually at least one survives the whole game and it ends by points or clock.
Having a flight of 3 He-111s is by far better than 3 BV-238s if they all make it through thats 6-7 times the amount of damage the He-111s would do. We already know that you find only fighter vs fighter aspect of air simulator appealing and everything else is boring to you.
Incentive to not bomb and bail and incentive to kill them even after they drop the payload.
I struggle side climbing in it to get enough alt to not be shot down by AAA as I want to make it back to base because I like the realism about it and that plane costs 130 SP and has a 5m cool down.
Wings Of Victory =WoVi=
It didn't create good game play in the 1990s. You're making the assumption that there is no in-game adaptation from players. So in that sense it's just a waste of time and unfortunate it's those aircraft that also get to end matches by their actions. Jump to: navigation, search.
So what you're saying is that you'd prefer to have a dedicated dogfight-only match running?
Sounds like the defenders should get organized better instead of complaining about the pounding, I always like to see a BV popping in, it's fun! Please convince me with facts and encouragement.Buy the bv 238, then go to the bank and buy more ge tovarisch xaxaxaxaHello mr gayjin employee i see you work hard to fool stupid capitalist gamer xaxaxaxThe BV238 gets shredded by P-61s who will always intercept you.As a P-61 pilot, yes.
War Thunder.
But payload is whats important. If you choose to ignore the bombers the match will be over with in 5-10 minutes of first spawn.
The only fix in my opinion would be to improve bombsights to be more realistic and targets to be actual objects rather than areas.
Yes, possibly, it would depend on the exact implementation details, in the meanwhile ec seems like the best substitute game mode for it.
Saying people should do more of the boring stuff is not really a good suggestion.
Once an interceptor is above a bomber there's very little a bomber can do in that situation in order to challenge the interceptor in any interesting way.
I know how powerful the AN/M2 is. Let's keep bombers to be treated as it should be treated - a potentially a thing that may (and in some games it is) bring a victory to the team.
1.